This blog is mainly for those interested in the Bloomfield Hills School District. The perspective slants toward my own, of course. I am a parent with two young kids in BHSD. The current race for the school district school board motivates my writing.
BHSD faces two substantial challenges in the coming years.
In the short term, we have to finish the renovation of the old Andover site while continuing to provide top quality education for all students, including my daughter who will be caught up in the transition.
In the longer term – and this, believe it or not, is a much, much tougher challenge – we must be ready to respond to ongoing “reforms” coming from Lansing.
The greatest changes will most likely come from Governor Snyder’s charge for the “Oxford group” (led by Engler administrator Richard McClellan) to rewrite the entire School Aid Act of 1979. Governor Snyder has been admirably insistent and clear even if what he says runs counter to my own current interests: money should follow individual students rather than districts. Indeed, “districts” are often discussed as an obstacle that can’t be circumvented because they are in the state constitution. So this rewriting will surely include challenges to current district-centric policies like “hold harmless” and “20j” funds that, quite frankly, allow BHSD to stay recognizable to those that knew it as a top district in the 1960s, 1970s,1980s, 1990s, and 2000s and prompted many to move here.
(If you want to know what current school board candidates know or don’t know about hold harmless please, please watch the first 13 minutes of the school board candidate forum - http://bhstv.bloomfield.org/category/bhstv-all.)
Briefly, hold harmless funding millages allow a district like BHSD to stay ahead of other districts in terms of per pupil spending; correspondingly, they allow us to stay ahead in the results that high per pupil spending yields. In a post Proposition A (1994) world where school funding no longer relates strictly to property taxes this money help distinguish us from other lesser districts.
That is, if you are still accustomed to thinking that BHSD will always be well funded and successful because Bloomfield remains an affluent district, well, the times, as the song goes, have “a-changed” – and they did some time ago. We are only feeling it now.
Whoever sits on the school board, then, must a) be willing to defend hold harmless funds in a full throated matter or articulate comparable solutions and b) be able to read and understand the complex financial calculations the state uses to determine funding so they can argue for/or against whatever the Oxford group proposes and explain those changes to the community.
Nothing matters more if you want what I want.
If you say you want BHSD to remain a top rated District but know a better way to pay for it please let us all know. Firing people and cutting programs does not constitute an educational solution. It satisfies a desire for political blood.
This is the reason I am fully supporting Howard Baron for school board. In these circumstances the best candidates must have substantive training and experience in finance and a dogged willingness to read through things like hold harmless millages. For most of us this isn’t fun work. But the complexity and tedium of the task does reveal how ill suited the job would be for those who 1) primarily enjoy throwing verbal bombs from the public comments podium or elsewhere 2) think BHSD should operate with less for the sake of operating with less or 3) should be led by political forces outside the district.
Not only does Mr. Baron have the academic training and experience (www.howardbaron.com) to handle these issues he has the calm, fair, and independent temperament to explain these issues to the community at large and, frankly, our local state representatives. Since August Mr. Baron has attended and participated in six Community Partnership meetings, eight PTO meetings, and several BHSD events to try to reach out and work with as many people in the District as possible. This is on top of his work over the last two years with the Community Partnership Committees.
This kind of commitment and openness to all is honorable; more importantly, it is necessary. We are fortunate to have him willing to serve.
Ann
5:18 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012
Thank you for this excellent and concise description of the most important problem facing Bloomfield Hills Schools. Post-Prop A school funding is hard to understand, and few do. The Oxford committee's recommendations could turn our District upside down.
Publius Valerius 48304
6:04 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012
How do we learn more about the Oxford Grop and the pending proposals in Lansing? Is the School Board on top of this issue?
Neal Charness
9:08 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Ken's comments are spot on and in reading the post and links I am more than a little concerned. That the Oxford Group is run by a former Engler person concerns me. There's a definite challenge about funding education in Lansing because some people are trying to retaliate against teachers for supporting the other party. That's a shame--should people boycott businesses because they generally support Republicans? Neither one of these solutions helps us.
I'd love to know how to put pressure on the Oxford Group to make sure their work is open and transparent so that the schools are treated fairly.
Publius Valerius 48304
6:06 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012
By the way, driving around this morning I saw a lot of illegally placed School Board candidate signs (particularly Moigis signs)... very disappointing.
Elizabeth
7:42 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Please, can we leave signs out of this discussion? It doesn't get us anywhere.
Our time would be better spent on the content of this blog, learning about what Governor Snyder, the Michigan Legislature and the Oxford Foundation is doing with, to, and for public education in our state and the implications to funding and curriculum that would come from the impending decisions in Lansing. These decisions will be our new reality by the time the next State budget is approved!
The following statement is a quote from the "Disaggregating High School Education" piece on the Oxford Foundation's website:
"Public education in Michigan is a highly regulated industry with most of
the regulations emanating from the state. While there is a general belief in “local control”
of public schools, it is state law and state regulations, plus state control over the $1
billion+ federal funds that actually control."
Let's mull on that for a while rather than on signs.
Jon
8:17 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Agree with Elizabeth about leaving signs out of this important thread...but I will say you can report signs that violate ordinance here:
http://www.bloomfieldtwp.org/Services/PlanningBuildingOrdinance/CodeAndOrdinanceDivision/ComplaintForm.asp
You will need an accurate address.
Publius Valerius 48304
11:13 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Fair enough, I call on ALL the campaigns that are doing it to stop, not just Mr. Moigis. You are ALL littering the public right of ways and setting a poor example for our kids, whom we ask to follow rules. Everyone needs to set a good example here, including you Chris. This is not your first election, nor the first for others involved . EVERYONE knows the rules and I would like to think the rules would be followed.
Ann
6:10 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012
Publius Valerius, the best source of information I've found is the BHSD Community Partnership Committee for Legislative Matters. The moderator has sent out the best articles I've seen. There are also people at Oakland Schools who are trying to follow it.
That said, the Oxford Group is effectively acting in secret. They said they would have a public forum in early October. They also asked for input via this survey (which you will see telegraphs quite clearly what they already plan to do, regardless of input): http://oxfordfoundationmi.com/2012/09/19/michigan-education-finance-project-seeks-input-from-education-groups-parents-and-the-public/
Elizabeth
7:40 pm on Sunday, October 14, 2012
Thank you Ken for highlighting the Oxford Foundation. This is effort in Lansing is truly going to change public education as we know it. I urge everyone to read up on what they are doing for the Governor.
The Oxford Foundation: http://oxfordfoundationmi.com/
This particular proposal (written by the OF) is what we are likely looking at for the future of Michigan's public high school: http://oxfordfoundationmi.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/pdf-version-oxford-foundation-disaggregating-the-high-school-education-public-education-finance-project.pdf
Ken Jackson
7:57 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Elizabeth and Ann,
Thank you for the very useful links.
Marcia Robovitsky
9:37 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
I am voting for Jenny Greenwell for the two year term for Bloomfield Hills School Trustee.
Ken Jackson
10:20 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Ms. Robovitsky,
I will post about the 2 year race in a day or two. As a government "watch dog" I think you would agree it important that we not blur issues or candidates together in a way that might distort things for the casual reader. This is a hazardous potential of Patch and all online publications. This post is about the Oxford Group and my opinion that Howard Baron is the best candidadte best equipped to handle these most serious of challenges.
Marcia Robovitsky
3:49 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Interesting that you don't want to "blur issues", when that is exactly what you and others do when other bloggers or opinion writers submit entries to Patch. This blog may be what you want it to be, just like Jenny's posts are what she wants to talk about but others change the message. I'm changing your message....vote for Jenny.
Another change to your message: "...they are in the state constitution." is the main reason to vote NO on the Nov. 6 ballot issues 2-6 as they would become part of the state constitution if passed.
A third change to your message: What exactly does Howard know about the Oxford Group? Only what he has read or special information? Others running for the school board can read the same public information.
Fourth comment: not many people attend the Community Partnership meetings...
I'm still voting for Jenny Greenwell, 2 yr. term for School Trustee.
Ann
10:20 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
This Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/MichiganSchoolLegislation is an attempt to keep BHSD parents up-to-date on legislation affecting our schools. It is very much open to input from anyone who has information that should be shared.
Mary
11:14 am on Monday, October 15, 2012
Ditto on support for Howard Baron!His backround is exactly what the BHSD needs on the board!
A concerned citizen
7:02 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Please also log on to www.bhsforum.com and see what majority of the community has been talking about for the last four years. No wonder nobody wants the incumbents - Ingrid, Berndt and Herner on the board, they do nothing but rubber stamp 7:0 with no wisdom, conscience and farsightedness.
Vote for Greenwell, Moigis and Baron!!!
Ken Jackson
7:10 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Hi "Concerned Citizen,"
I understand Mr. Roach has decided to try to link these three candidates as a slate. They aren't. This is the kind of (increasingly) repugnant political campaigning many have decided to confront. It is a shame that at a school board level concerned citizens would try these tactics.
Mac
7:08 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
www.bhsforum.com is Chris Fellin's website; Chris Fellin is also the treasurer for the committee financing the campaigns of Greenwell and Moigis.
Neal Charness
8:45 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
I haven't yet heard that the Oakland County Clerk's office has closed the investigation of Chris on campaign finance irregularities. He just might not be a role model here.
A concerned citizen
8:26 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Hi! Mr. Jackson and Mac,
Many residents of the Bloomfield School District know rather well that Mr. Roach has no horse in this race. He is a very hard working conscientious citizen, who cares very deeply about what is in the best interest of the community.
Regarding www.bhsforum.com - it is a purely community generated forum and no other school district can match up to it!
I am an independent, and feel that Greenwell, Moigis and Baron are independents as well, and have the grey matter to make correct decisions in the best interest of the students of the district for generations to come.
This district has been brought to its knees by self-serving people, and it time to put aside personal agendas and do what is ethical, moral and legal. That's my slate, and the slate of those who are truly concerned about what is best for our schools and our children and our future which they serve.
Mac
9:15 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Mr. Roach has sent out email(s) making it very clear that he does have a horse/horses in the race. And bhsforum.com is a product of a very specific group of people, starting with Mr. Fellin.
I am very surprised that you consider the rest of us to be unconcerned with our children, their future, and their schools. It has not been my experience that only those supporting the 20/20 candidates are concerned about their/my/our children.
Neal Charness
8:40 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
Anothercoward unwilling to use his/her name, joining the ranks of Ms. Maidstone and others. I still find it fairly interesting that no one with children in our schools professes to support Greenwell, et al. Someone posting anonymously certainly doesn't count. I wouldn't expect that no one would support them but it's really very interesting that no one with children to look out for has spoken up.
A concerned citizen
11:20 pm on Monday, October 15, 2012
To Mac,
Sorry, you misunderstood my statement. I am referring to those people who have been power mongers and purely self-interested and have made our children (including my own in the BHSD schools) suffer in the process, along with many families and innocent taxpayers.
I am not a coward, or I would not have spoken up here. What is being said here is important and the mere name of a person is irrelevant when it is ideas which count.
Some very negative results have occurred to students and employees whose relatives took one side or the other. Hence many like to communicate, but not give their names out or they get targeted just the way Mrs. Greenwell, Mr. Roach and Mr. Fellin have been targeted in this chain of communication.
I will sign off for now, having appreciated your expressing your doubts. I have to have put your mind at rest. I do not belong to any group nor have given a dime to any. My chosen screen name, truthfully, says it all.
Neal Charness
7:43 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Whoever "concerned citizen" is he/she is a coward. Wrote a "hit and run" piece under a pseudonym. It's really old when being asked to support your claims becomes being a target. I don't believe anything in the last 3 paragraphs and I double any one else does either. I do have a strong hunch the poster has posted under a different name over the past year or so but has decided to use the "hit and run" play.
Neal Charness
8:17 am on Tuesday, October 16, 2012
typo: double should be "doubt." Sorry for any confusion.