patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

Wrong Proposal; Wrong Ballot

Voters in the Bloomfield Hills Schools are righfully out-raged that our Board of Education has chosen to go to a May 8 ballot for approval of their "hybrid" plan and tax bond to pay for it.

The May 8 election will cost about $60,000. That money was intended for the education of K-12 and special needs students. The proposal was "schematically" designed by Fielding Nair, a virtual architectural firm, at a cost of $863,114. That money was ALSO supposed to be used to educate K-12 and special needs students.

How much money was spent to hold the series of Town Hall meetings, facilitated by consultant Charlie Fleetham? Fleetham also "facilitates" other committee meetings. That money was also intended to be spent to educate our students.

The BHSD has recently hired a new PR person. Her salary is over $90,000. She has a staff. Wouldn't you prefer to spend that kind of money on a really great teacher?

What the BHSD needs is a reasonable board, a reasonable (and comprehensive, district-wide) facilities plan, and a November ballot.

We've spent far too much on "consultants" and PR.

Our board has wasted another opportunity to do the right thing, and a whole lot of education tax dollars in the process.

Jennifer F

7:23 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Wow. Nothing here that you said discusses the upcoming proposal. I thought I was going to read something that discusses the issues on the ballot, but was mistaken. If they waited until November it would have impacted the kds for at least another year of transition....enough is enough. Lets mve forward already, rather than keeping up this nonsense. Let's remember the bottom line, our children's future and education. I couldn't disagree with you more, Ms. Greenwell. Right proposal, right ballot. They have my YES vote.

Reply

J Arch

7:43 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Jenny continues to ignore the inconvenient truth that leaving things status quo would cause $2.4 million in excess operating expenses by not combining the high schools into a single building and worse for education, it would cause the reduction of programming in the separate high schools (AP/IB classes, electives, extracurriculars) because there is no longer enough student population (i.e. funding) in each building to support the level of education that Bloomfield Hills has been historically accustomed to and that is necessary to attract new families to the District.

J. Wagner

Reply

Cara McAlister

10:11 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The Michigan House of Representatives, and many other states, have legislation on the docket to outlaw May school ballots of any kind. I suspect the district feels they have a better chance of surprising taxpayers that they hope will not get to the polls in on May 8. Vote No so that we retain our two, pefectly good high schools. The two schools passed inspection recently. Nothing major is wrong with them. As we see with Cranbrook, age of buildings necessitates regular maintenance, but does not limit opportunities for great education. That takes talent and imagination, not developers. Birmingham came up with one plan, to renovate all K-12 buildings and their taxpayers approved it and it was done. Birmingham cut at the top - they reduced the number of administrators, and sold their administration building and moved the rest into Groves High. That is serious cutting and serious planning over a long period of time. Our Board will ask for tax dollars next to retro-fit a Wellness Center building, and hire contractor doctors and nurses, renovate all of the middle school and elementaries and who knows what is next. But, they mostly talk about construction. Our students have what they need now - 900 students in a building at most, not 1,650. Why would Bloomfield seek to emulate Lake Orion, Royal Oak and Howell, who couldn't afford to operate the large high school they built. Can we?

Reply

Amy Cardin

10:53 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Wow...not sure where to begin, what with all the misinformation in Jenny's post and Cara's comment. Here is the truth. The BHSD will have ONE high school beginning in the fall of 2013. That is a done deal. The status quo is not an option. The ONLY thing we will be voting on at the May 8 ballot is whether to approve a bond for the hybrid facility. The fiscally responsible, forward-thinking plan will save the district an estimated $2.4 million annually. The plan will preserve curriculum, enhance opportunities and give our students and staff appropriate spaces to learn and teach for many decades to come. And by voting YES on May 8, the building process could begin immediately allowing for quicker completion, less transition time and greater savings. The choice is clear. 14 months of planning, gathering community input and number crunching has brought the best plan to us for a vote. It is a masterful compromise (hybrid=part renovation, part new construction) that came about after thoughtful LISTENING and yeoman efforts from our School Board, Administration, design team, community members, students and staff. Please vote YES on May 8. It is a positive, supportive vote for our students, our staff and our community.

Reply

Stacey

10:57 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

You obviously don't have children in high school. These buildings are so run down - I wouldn't kennel dogs in them. 900 students in each building cannot sustain programs - they can't fill classes. Hundreds of students get bussed every day between the two facilities. Serious planning over a longer period of time?? They started this process eight years ago! How much longer do you suggest? Students are embarrassed and ashamed of their facilities. They recognize the schools are too small - many are excited about combining (I say many because I can't speak for all - just the ones I know personally). They are downright jealous when they go to Groves, Lake Orion and Northville to compete athletically. It suggests to them that the community they live in don't support or care about them. Lets finally do whats right and invest in our children, our property values and our community!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenny Greenwell

11:18 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

This writer should contact the school board and find out WHY they wasted the 2004 Sinking Fund! That money was intended to repair, upgrade and maintain our two small high schools. What happened to all that money?
Why are students being bussed? Don't our teachers have cars? Have they heard of Skype? Sounds like an indictment against our Board of Education for waste and incompetence! (Groves has been renovated, as our high schools SHOULD HAVE BEEN by now!)

Stacey

11:29 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Did you honestly just suggest that my fifteen year old learn via skype???? Do we need to get into a logistics battle? Isn't easier to transport a busload of students to then fan out to the many classes offered instead of trying force them into schedules that don't work for them to accomodate teachers running back and forth between buildings? Lets do the math once again...Groves has more students. For the record - I completely support our board.

Reply

Amy Cardin

11:36 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Jenny, you know as well as anyone that the Sinking Fund monies were and continue to be put to good use by the disctict. The lengthy list of completed and ongoing Sinking Fund projects is available to anyone who wishes to see it. And while I do believe teachers have cars, having them drive between the buildings still leaves half the kids at the other building! Are you suggesting that the kids carpool with the teachers? And in reference to the Skype comment, I for one believe in a superb teacher, physically in the classroom teaching our students. That is what has made us a top-performing district and what will keep us there. Now we need to raise up our facilities to allow those top teachers and inspired students to achieve at the highest level possible. The plan is right for our community and I encourage everyone to vote YES on May 8.

Reply

GEORGE DERDERIAN

2:01 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Voting yes voting no, name calling, false negative comments, talking about the past, we all know mistakes have been made by both sides but NOW times have changed! The fact is we have a good new superintendent in Rob Glass, The fact is our schools are in the worst shape in the area, The fact is Rob Glass has listened to many, The fact is he has come up with a fair and reasonable plan, The fact is everyone can get all the information they desire about the plan, The fact is, this is not stealth election but well informed May 8th date. Now we, as a community MUST step up to the plate and vote YES on MAY 8TH. It is,"THE RIGHT PLAN, THE RIGHT COST, THE RIGHT TIME" Join my family and I in voting YES on May 8th. George Derderian Jr.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jenny Greenwell

2:51 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

George Derderian's wife works for the BHSD.
I guess he forgot to mention that when he stated his disclaimer of no conflict of interest.
A BHSD salary is a "conflict of interest," especially when it comes to school funding issues.
He was the campaign manager for B20/20 in 2004 (we won!) and 2005 (we lost!)
George has not been involved in any way with B20/20 since 2005, and he was not a "founding member" as he claims.
B20/20 was founded as an advocacy group for public education, in hopes of bringing board activities into "sync" with community values for academic acheivement and superior education outcomes.
George is really into soccer, and that's ok, but soccer is not algebra, soccer is not a foreign language, and soccer is not chemistry.
BHSD taxpayers moved here for superior education. The fact that our schools need work is evidence of school board neglect...the money has been there since 2004!
BHSD taxpayers are very generous!

Neal Charness

5:06 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012

The blogger and her associates have the freedom to say what they wish. Others have the right to move forward. The have posted sufficiently that people who wish to know where their agenda lies need merely click on their names and read the posts they've made to various blogs. Form your own impressions. I have great faith in the intelligence of our community.

Reply

Cara McAlister

5:04 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Vote No on May 8 and get two schools, with less than 1,650 in them, which is best for the students. The two high schools, and our other schools have been neglected by the school board! The very people responsible for their care. Because the $80 million in sinking funds that was promised to be used for maintenance WAS NOT. Mismanagement. Our daughter had rainwater dripping on her head in Chemistry class at Lahser. In Bloomfield? Give me a break. AND, George Derderian has not been a member of B2020 for many years (I know because I have been) and was not a founding member. His wife works for the school district. To say otherwise, is misleading people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Elizabeth

11:24 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Cara,
Once again, please go see for yourself where the sinking funds have been spent. This is a very informative presentation http://vimeo.com/35330201
While you watch the video, you will see that there are still 7 years of sinking funds yet to be collected. If they haven’t been collected they can’t have been spent.

Jenny Greenwell

6:41 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

B20/20 welcomes all who are interested in top-ranked academics and beautifully maintained schools. We run campaigns when we have to, but for the most part, B20/20 exists for the purpose of reminding our board to focus on education and prudent financial management. The fact that our schools need work is an indictment of our Trustees. Signs of deferred maintenance were noticed in 2002, and despite millions of new tax dollars, that maintenance has not been completed!
That's a shame, and it hurts our students performance and experience. My own kids used to joke about the "broken" faucets and other maintenance issues at Lahser...those jokes were never funny, and certainly aren't now!

Reply

Leave a comment